Showing posts with label no choice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label no choice. Show all posts
Thursday, October 4, 2012
How Stupid Are Obama 2012 Bumper Sticker Users?
How stupid are Obama 2012 bumper sticker users? Obama has demonstrated that he is Bush's third term. Why don't people just put old Obama 2008 stickers on their car and celebrate their hopey, changey aspirations of four years ago?
Living near a bunch of retired, rich, white people in a city in the US that traditionally votes for the candidate with the blue label, I find that I see too many expensive, new cars with Obama 2012 bumper stickers. (BTW, one is too many.) My observations suggest that if you drive near me and you have an Obama 2012 sticker, you are most likely a female baby boomer with a car that costs too much for an average working American to afford. I haven't noticed many of these Obama 2012 stickers on the cars of the poorer, younger people who work for a living and enable the luxury-filled lives of these rich, retired people. I admit that some of these younger people have older cars with Obama 2008 stickers.
I have sympathy for people with an Obama 2008 sticker. They wanted a change from the Bush regime. They bought the advertised image of hope and change. There was no delivery of anything good by Obama. Maybe the people with the Obama 2008 stickers want the candidate who ran four years ago.
Obama claims that he can assassinate, torture, indefinitely imprison without charge anybody who he damn well pleases. I didn't know that murder, torture and kidnapping were "hippie values", not even for rich, flag-waving, Social Security-sucking hippies. The other day I saw an Obama 2012 bumper sticker on the new Volvo station wagon of a 60-something woman. Her car had a few other stickers, too. The most prominent one advertised that she is a "Hippie Chick." This post is for her. If you know somebody stupid enough to have an Obama 2012 sticker on her car, please send her a link to this post.
I have more sympathy for people with Romney stickers. These people are suffering from the 2012 edition of the hopey, changey delusion. I'm no fan of Romney or any other Wall Street criminal. If you know of a person who suffers from the delusion that Romney will be good for them or for America, please send him a link to this post.
I'm sure there are some people who will benefit from Romney and from Obama. What I don't know is whether they have Romney / Obama stickers on the back of their private jets.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
How Stupid Are Republicans?
How stupid are Republicans? The Republicans chose a Wall St criminal for their candidate for president. Wall St criminals destroyed the American way of life and the American economy. No sane voter would choose a Wall St criminal for president.
I'm not arguing that the offering from the Democrats is any better. The blue can of diarrhea is the worst president in the history of the US. However, the Democrats have as their excuse that he is their current offering, and to change that offering would be to admit that he is a failure. From the perspective of Obama's owners (Blankfein, Dimon, Corzine, et al), Obama has been a great success. Obama has shackled and screwed the average American per his masters' instructions.
What I am suggesting is that in a country where there are only two choices permitted, it makes sense for those few deciding who the approved candidates will be to offer an indistinguishable choice. When pried away from gazing into a mirror or selecting human targets for his fleet of drones, Obama does the bidding of Wall St criminals. Now to cut-out the middleman, the voters' approved alternative is a Wall St criminal.
I always vote and more often for Republicans than Democrats. In 2008 Bush (the child) was the worst president in the history of the US, and I did not vote for Obama. Obama has been an even worse president, but I will NOT vote for Romney. I will NOT vote for a Wall St criminal. I've spoken about this with a number of my friends who call themselves Republicans. The nicest thing any of them said about Romney is that he isn't Obama.
Blue can of diarrhea or red can of diarrhea? What's on your menu?
I will not vote for a can of diarrhea.
I'm not arguing that the offering from the Democrats is any better. The blue can of diarrhea is the worst president in the history of the US. However, the Democrats have as their excuse that he is their current offering, and to change that offering would be to admit that he is a failure. From the perspective of Obama's owners (Blankfein, Dimon, Corzine, et al), Obama has been a great success. Obama has shackled and screwed the average American per his masters' instructions.
What I am suggesting is that in a country where there are only two choices permitted, it makes sense for those few deciding who the approved candidates will be to offer an indistinguishable choice. When pried away from gazing into a mirror or selecting human targets for his fleet of drones, Obama does the bidding of Wall St criminals. Now to cut-out the middleman, the voters' approved alternative is a Wall St criminal.
I always vote and more often for Republicans than Democrats. In 2008 Bush (the child) was the worst president in the history of the US, and I did not vote for Obama. Obama has been an even worse president, but I will NOT vote for Romney. I will NOT vote for a Wall St criminal. I've spoken about this with a number of my friends who call themselves Republicans. The nicest thing any of them said about Romney is that he isn't Obama.
Blue can of diarrhea or red can of diarrhea? What's on your menu?
I will not vote for a can of diarrhea.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)